-
- 연구보고서
- 이슈+
- 인재채용
- 연구원개요
- 정보공개
- 고객헌장 및 서비스 이행표준
- 학술지
- 농정포커스
- 공지사항
- 조직도
- 공공데이터 개방
- VOC 처리절차
- 글로벌 정보
- KREI논단
- 보도자료
- 원장실
- KREI 정보공개
- 개인정보 처리방침
- 농업농촌국민의식조사
- 주간브리프
- KREI I-zine
- 연구사업소개
- 사업실명제
- CCTV 설치 및 운영안내
- 세미나
- 농업농촌경제동향
- 농경나눔터
- 경영목표
- 연구협력협정 체결현황
- 홈페이지 저작권 정책
- 농식품재정사업리포트
- 동정&행사
- 윤리경영
- 해외출장연수보고
- 이메일 무단수집 금지
- 농업관측정보
- 연구제안
- 신고센터
- 질의응답
- 인권경영
- 체육시설 및 주차장 운영안내
- 뉴스레터
- 임업관측정보
- ESG경영
- KREI CI
- 찾아오시는 길
-
- 연구보고서
- 농촌경제
- 세계농업정보
- 개요
- 자료집
- 채용안내
- 원장 인사말
- 인권경영비전
- 안내
- 경영정보공시
- 국내
- 제1장 총칙
- ESG경영목표및전략
- 수시연구과제
- 논문기고안내
- 해외곡물시장동향
- 정보그림
- 채용공고
- 원장 약력
- 인권경영 추진체계
- 공공데이터 수요조사
- 사전정보공표
- 국외
- 제2장 공정한 직무수행
- ESG경영 추진체계
- 2024년 기본·일반연구보고서
- 논문작성도우미
- 농축산물수입동향(FTA)
- 조사결과
- 친인척 채용인원 공개
- 역대 원장소개
- 인권침해 구제절차 신고
- KREI 핵심정보
- 제3장 부당 이득의 수수 금지 등
- ESG 실천과제 및 추진성과
- 관련자료
- 인권경영 활동/교육
- 참고자료
- KREI RESEARCHER
- 제4장 건전한 공직풍토의 조성
- ESG성과평가
- 인권경영 지침/자료
- 제5장 위반시의 조치 등
- ESG경영위원회 운영기준
- 제6장 보칙
연구보고서
농식품 원산지표시의 효과 분석과 활용도 제고 방안

목차
제1장 서론
제2장 원산지표시제도의 운영현황
제3장 원산지표시의 사회적 후생 영향 분석
제4장 소비자 제품 평가 영향 분석
제5장 원산지 단속의 효과 분석
제6장 원산지표시제도의 활용도 제고 방안
제7장 요약 및 결론
요약문
원산지표시제도가 다양한 표시제도 중에서 가장 우선적으로 도입되어 적극적인 정책지원을 받았음에도 불구하고 구체적인 효과를 분석한 사례는 크게 부족하다. 식품 원산지표시제도의 성과에 대한 분석으로는 90% 이상에 달하는 높은 소비자 인지도 조사가 대부분이며, 원산지표시의 사회적 후생 영향 분석과 소비자 영향 평가를 본격적으로 다루지 못하였다.
이 연구는 원산지표시의 사회적 후생에 대한 영향을 평가하고, 식품유형 및 소비자 특성을 감안한 소비자의 원산지 인식과 단속업무의 효과 분석을 바탕으로 원산지표시제도의 활용도를 제고하기 위한 방안을 제시하고자 추진되었다.
This research was carried out under the objective of providing basic data for future implementation of a differentiation policy for domestic agricultural foods through an analysis of the operation status of the country-of-origin labelling system, its social welfare impact and influence on consumers' recognition and purchase of foods, and the effect of enforcement on labellng violations.
The country-of-origin labelling system was introduced in June 1993 for agricultural and fisheries products and their processed foods which are to be distributed domestically, and for restaurants the system was applied starting from beef for roasting in 2007 while the objects were expanded covering major items since July 2008.
In order to measure the economic effects of the country-of-origin labelling system, an equilibrium displacement model (EDM) was estimated for chili powder, bean and bean curd, beef, pork and ham, and changes in social welfare were analyzed. Analysis showed that distribution cost for country-of-origin labelling was 0.07~0.25% of selling price and the amount which consumers are willing to pay was 2.4~3.2% of selling price. Even if we consider administrative cost and fixed cost for the operation of the country-of-origin labelling system, the increased amount of net social welfare was analyzed to be 461.8~744.6 billion won.
The results of a questionnaire survey conducted on a population of 505 consumers revealed that the consumers had high interest in country-of-origin labelling for agricultural and fisheries products, whereas they had low interest in the country of origin of processed foods and restaurant foods. When consumers purchase foods through the internet, the degree of checking country of origin was significantly lower compared to the case of buying foods in the market. The levels of consumer's intention to pay by country of origin were analyzed to be 61.6% for Chinese bean ('Seoritae') and 55.4% for Chinese chili powder taking Korean origin as 100. The levels for bean curd made of imported bean were in the range of 53.5~65.9% which were in the order of bean curd made of Australian bean⟩that made of American bean⟩that made of imported bean⟩that made of Chinese bean. In the case of beef, beef of American origin was 53.8% and Australian origin was 57.7% while the price of imported pork which consumers intend to pay was 50% levels, which were in the order of that made in America⟩that made in the Netherlands⟩that made in Chile. Young consumers' level of intention to pay for domestic products was relatively low for all the products. Even in the case of same country of origin, consumers' evaluations on country of origin were different depending on items. While the country-of-origin system contributed to the forecast of safety and quality, its credibility was evaluated to be insufficient. As to the method of activation, reinforcement of punishment for the violating traders was the highest at 36% and reinforcement of enforcement (29%) and announcement of violations (21%) followed in that order.
The results of an analysis on the data obtained by the enforcement staff of National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service revealed that the business type with the highest proportion of enforcement cases was restaurants, taking up 54.7% in the total number of enforcement cases in 2010, and the companies which were subject to the most enforcement were large discount stores that recorded an annual average of 15.2 cases of such enforcement. The result of a calculation for an optimum strategy for enforcement by calculating the Nash equilibrium under a mixed strategy revealed that, at a low level of penalty, the probability of violation was significantly reduced at the time of increase in penalty whereas, at a high level of penalty, the increase in penalty was significantly slowed down. While the probability of actual enforcement was higher than that of optimum enforcement in the case of general restaurants and meat-eating restaurants where enforcements are intensively conducted, the probability of enforcement in the case of small portion sellers, feeding service materials supplying companies, and producing companies and others was significantly lower than the probability of optimum enforcement.
As the country-of-origin labelling system was proved to increase net social welfare, it is necessary to implement measures to activate the system continuously in the future. In order to activate the operation of the country-of-origin labelling system, the scope of application for the system should be improved while creating the base for operation. And also it will be necessary to review the method to re-establish the standard for country-of-origin labelling for agricultural and fisheries processed products based on the target items of agricultural and fisheries products on a mid to long-term basis, while adjusting the target items reflecting the trend of food consumption on a short-term basis. For the activation of the country-of-origin labelling system for mail orders, it is necessary to take measures such as education of relevant industry on detailed implementation procedures in the form of a manual, expansion of publicity targeting consumers who use mail orders, and intensification of enforcement utilizing a cyber enforcement team. In order to create the base for operation of the country-of-origin labelling system, education programs targeting children and youth should be intensified because the consumer's intention to pay for domestic products is lower if the age is younger, while activating the publicity to children and youth utilizing the internet and SNS which have high accessibility. Together with enforcement, it will be necessary to implement expansion support policies, such as the expansion of the selection of superior companies for country-of-origin labelling, and the connection of the system to a pertinent system, such as the product history system and quarantine system, should be improved. For the improvement of the country-of-origin labelling system, it is necessary to prepare an improvement plan in consideration of companies' burdens. For example, the 'imported product' marking for processed foods not only violates the principle of marking for imported country but also does not satisfy the preference of consumers due to big differences in the consumers' evaluation on country of origin. And also the status of country-of-origin labelling for raw materials of processed food and the marking method should be reviewed for improvement. In the case of restaurant and delivered foods, it is necessary to provide active guidance and publicity, such as reviewing the regulation for marking referring to the cases of the violation of marking and preparing and distributing guidelines for diversified marking methods to restaurants. In case the items which are from different countries of origin are mixed, a detailed method should be reviewed so that the item with higher proportion should be marked first while prohibiting to mark as 'domestic products' in case a certain level of domestic products is not reached. In the case of kimchi, it will be necessary to collect the opinions on the method of marking the country of origin for major spices while considering the method of marking as 'domestic products' only in case all spices used are domestic products. As the regulation for country of origin for attached beef spare ribs may be difficult to understand from the standpoint of consumers and as there is the possibility of confusion and misunderstanding, it is necessary to consider the method of specifying that the attached beef spare ribs are excluded from beef spare ribs processed products when defining 'beef spare ribs processed products' in the pertinent official notifications. In case imported livestock is raised for a certain period of time domestically and is distributed domestically, change should be made to clearly indicate the country of birth and the country of breeding. For efficient operation of enforcements, it is necessary to consider the method to distribute joint enforcement works of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and local governments depending on the nature of the work. As the manpower for enforcement of country-of-origin labelling for fisheries products is insufficient and the target companies are considerably duplicated, the integration of management should be reviewed on a mid to long-term basis while specifying the guidelines for joint enforcement works on a short-term basis. As the performance of enforcement is decided based on the level of punishment and the number of enforcement, a detailed plan should be established based on a proper analysis of penalty, fines and the number of enforcements to achieve optimum performance of enforcement. The level of penalty should be raised for efficient enforcement. As enforcements have been intensively implemented reflecting the interests of consumers in the case of meat, the probability of violation is estimated to be less compared to other foods, whereas enforcement should be expanded for processed meat products including spiced meat. The necessity to intensify enforcement on small portion sellers, feeding service material suppliers and producing companies by the target business type was raised. From regional standpoint, enforcement in the Gyeonggi Province region needs to be intensified further considering the distribution situation of the companies. In order to expand the base for the enforcement of country of origin, an information-sharing system among pertinent institutions should be established, and it is essentially needed to cultivate experts for the enforcement of country of origin, to ensure efficient operation of special enforcement teams and to expand the base for scientific analysis.
Researchers: Kyei-Im Lee, So-hyun Cho
E-mail Address: lkilki@krei.re.kr
저자정보

저자에게 문의

구매안내
KREI의 출판물은 판매 대행사 (정부간행물판매센터)와 아래 서점에서 구입 하실 수 있습니다.
판매대행사
판매서점
교보문고 | http://www.kyobobook.co.kr |
---|---|
영풍문고 | http://www.ypbooks.co.kr |
알라딘 | http://www.aladin.co.kr |
-
상세정보 조회55980
-
좋아요2
-
다운로드98
같은 분야 보고서
-
식량 위기에 관한 인식 및 대응 현황 조사 분석
최윤영2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
농업인 디지털정보화 증진 방안 연구
심재헌2024.10.30KREI 보고서 -
저출생·초고령화에 관한 농촌 주민의 경험과 인식: : 초점집단토론 자료(1)
김정섭2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
인구구조 변화에 따른 식품시장 대응과제 (1/2차년도)
박미성2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
그린바이오 산업의 성장산업화 방안연구(1/2차년도) - 종자 및 마이크로바이옴산업 중심으로
윤종열2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
2024년 농업·농촌에 대한 국민의식조사
김수린2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
농촌 주민이 생각하는 지역사회의 저출생·초고령화 대응 과제 : 초점집단토론 자료(2)
김정섭2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
지역별 농지거래 실태 분석
채광석2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
저출생·초고령화에 대응한 농촌정책의 전환(1/2차년도)
김정섭2024.12.30KREI 보고서 -
순환경제 이행을 위한 농식품산업 업(리)사이클링 전략 연구
우병준2024.12.30KREI 보고서
- 다음글
- 농어업 부가가치의 새로운 창출을 위한 식품산업의 중장기 발전 전략(3/5차연도)
- 이전글
- 농림수산 서비스산업 발전방안 연구